Every distinct culture is rich in untouchable topics, features, belief systems and the like, but few are richer in stringent ‘a-priori rules’ than the American norm system. I find it counterintuitive that, in a society that prides itself in championing personal freedom and individual responsibility, there are so many places ‘you just don’t go’.
You don’t
show up at a friend’s or a neighbor’s house, uninvited.
You don’t
talk about money, religion, or politics at social gatherings.
You don’t
let your grass grow beyond a few inches and you certainly don’t allow it to be
overtaken by dandelions.
You don’t kneel
when the national anthem is played.
You don’t
disrespect the flag (but you are allowed to wear it as a bathing suit, covering
your bottom).
Note that
none of these norms contribute in any way to a better understanding between
people, to a more compassionate ambiance, or to better respect for diversity of
opinion and heritage. How much better off would we have been if we had embraced
an entirely different set of norms? Norms that would support more solidarity
between people of different creed, provenance, race, sexual orientation,
education level, and societal status. And norms that would provide a corner
stone for a common purpose and collective ambition.
The American
culture has developed from rebellion against authority (the British rule) and
the frontier spirit. But the British rule was vanquished, and the frontier has
been pushed back into the Pacific Ocean. Yet, it seems, we have never adjusted
to the new reality. Or, at least, a vocal minority of us has refused to adjust
to the new reality and has organized politically to preserve the outdated
norms. And, because of peculiarities in the American system of public
governance, they may very well be in control for the foreseeable future.
America is
still the most prosperous and powerful country on earth, but it can’t build
consensus on how to put that prosperity and power to good use. It lacks the
collective will and strategic plan to apply its wealth and power to a process
of improving the life of humankind, in America first, but, closely behind, all
over the world.
Just in the
past twenty years, America has squandered trillions of dollars on unnecessary
and ill-fated wars. Think about the tremendous good that kind of money could
have done, had it been applied to causes that would have improved the lot of
humanity. Like redoubling efforts to cure −as yet− incurable diseases; or taking
effective steps in minimizing human contributions to climate change and
building defenses against the impacts of global warming; or simply reducing the
inequalities (in income, access to healthcare and education, safety and
security, and wellness), not resulting from personal shortcomings but merely
and directly from where you were born and who your parents are.
The Biden
administration is making a serious effort to redirect public spending in that
direction and increase it measurably. But it is hampered by a razor thin margin
of support in Congress, by a impatient and rebellious left wing of the
Democratic party, and by archaic parliamentary rules of the Senate. If, in the
year it has left before the next election, it fails in getting its ambitious
agenda of physical and human infrastructure improvement, and voting reform past
Congress and signed into law, it is unlikely to get a second chance.
No one can,
in good conscience, argue that America does not have the financial strength to
implement the policy initiatives of the Biden administration. It may have to be
more reticent about getting entangled in unnecessary wars that it cannot win,
and it may have to rethink its tax structure and tax collection system, but it
certainly has the wealth generating power, the wherewithal, to address the
triple threat of incurable disease, global warming, and extreme inequality. The
real question is if America can muster the political will to shift away from
the frontier mentality of individual responsibility to a more cosmopolitan, contemporary,
mentality of collective responsibility for the wellness of society at large and
all the individuals comprised within.
The 2022 and
2024 elections will show us if that political will exists. The deck is stacked
against Joe Biden and the Democrats. The popular will, that largely seems to
support the Biden initiatives, does not account for much in the current system
of government. The gerrymandering of voting districts, limiting the House of
Representatives to 435 members (a number that was reached in 1913), the
disappearing political center, and the filibuster rule in the Senate have seen
to that. Midterm elections are notoriously unaccommodating to incoming
administrations and Joe Biden’s botching of the exit from Afghanistan is sure
to take away from any residual goodwill he may had retained with Republican
voters and lawmakers.
Unfortunately,
changing the American culture and national priorities has become a purely
partisan matter. We have managed to turn even sound public health policy on
vaccination and mask wearing into expressions of partisan creed. It should not
be that way. Societal strengthening never was and should not be a Democratic prerogative.
America will have a hard time being seen by the rest of the world as the
legitimate world leader, the example to emulate, if it fails to create a
better, more just and sustainable, society at home.
No comments:
Post a Comment